Skip to content
Back Home
  • About CJEL
    • About
    • Board of Advisors
    • Current Masthead
    • Archived Mastheads
  • CJEL Print
    • Latest Issues
    • Archives
    • Author Accolades
  • Blogs
    • About
    • Sports
    • Preliminary Reference
  • Contact
    • Subscriptions
    • Recruitment
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Submissions
  • Search
Back Home
  • Search
  • About CJEL
    • About
    • Board of Advisors
    • Current Masthead
    • Archived Mastheads
  • CJEL Print
    • Latest Issues
    • Archives
    • Author Accolades
  • Blogs
    • About
    • Sports
    • Preliminary Reference
  • Contact
    • Subscriptions
    • Recruitment
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Submissions
Print Articles Volume 16, Issue 1

CASE C-303/06, COLEMAN V. ATTRIDGE LAW & STEVE LAW

Published April 19, 2016

16 Colum. J. Eur. L. 161 (2009)

Tim Connor, University of Bradford, School of Law

You may also like

Comment: On Mark Roe, German Codetermination and German Securities Markets
Published February 1, 1998

Comment: On Mark Roe, German Codetermination and German Securities Markets

5 Colum. J. Eur. L. 213 (1999) Friedrich Kübler. Professor of Law Emeritus, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitit Frankfurt am Main, Professor of Law, […]

Case Law: Bic Benelux
Published July 1, 1998

Case Law: Bic Benelux

4 Colum. J. Eur. L. 657 (1998) Gaëtan Verhoosel. Institute for Environmental & Energy Law, Collegium Falconis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; Jones, Day, […]

CASE LAW: Case C-271/91, M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority, August 2, 1993. Effectiveness; Compensation for Damages; Direct Effect of Directives
Published November 1, 1994

CASE LAW: Case C-271/91, M.H. Marshall v. Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority, August 2, 1993. Effectiveness; Compensation for Damages; Direct Effect of Directives

1 Colum. J. Eur. L. 110 (1994) Jan Vanhamme. Researcher, Institute for European Law, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium. Ms. Marshall was employed […]

THE HEADSCARF AS A SYMBOLIC ENEMY OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS’ DEMOCRATIC JURISPRUDENCE: VIEWING ISLAM THROUGH A EUROPEAN LEGAL PRISM IN LIGHT OF THE SAHIN JUDGMENT
Published March 1, 2006

THE HEADSCARF AS A SYMBOLIC ENEMY OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS’ DEMOCRATIC JURISPRUDENCE: VIEWING ISLAM THROUGH A EUROPEAN LEGAL PRISM IN LIGHT OF THE SAHIN JUDGMENT

12 Colum. J. Eur. L. 573 (2006) Christopher D. Belelieu, J.D. Candidate, Columbia Law School, 2006; A.B., Georgetown University, 2003. This Note […]

© 2026 – All rights reserved

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.