Volume 18, Issue 1


CASE C-375/09 PREZES URZFDU OCHRONY KONKURENCJI I KONSUMENTOW V TELE2 POLSKA SP. Z O.O., NOW NETIA SA

THE PRIMACY OF THE COMMISSION IN  THE EUROPEAN COMPETITION NETWORK AS A SAFEGUARD AGAINST NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICIES AND  THE REJECTION  OF THE ‘PRIMUS INTER PARES’ DOCTRINE. Marco Amorese, Contract Professor of Competition Law 2010-2012 Universita degli Studi di Bergamo – Ph.D., Universith degli Studi di Brescia, LL.M. Harvard Law School, J.D. University of Milan, Studio legale Amorese.


EUROPEAN REGULATION TRANSFORMED: ADVERSARIAL LEGALISM’S MUTED ATLANTIC CROSSING

18 Colum. J. Eur. L. 165 (2011) EUROLEGALISM: THE TRANSFORMATION OF LAW AND REGULATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. By R. Daniel Kelemen, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.,  2011. Pp.366. Reviewed by Peter L. Lindseth, Olimpiad S. loffe Professor of International and Comparative Law, University of Connecticut School of Law.


GOODBYE EURO: LEGAL ASPECTS OF WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EUROZONE

18 Colum. J. Eur. L. 111 (2011) Hannes Hofmeister, Assistant Professor, University of Innsbruck, Institute for European and International law. For the first decade of its existence,. the Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”)  was a success. Sixteen countries adopted the euro, and many other Member States were eager to follow  suit. International confidence in the new currency grew steadily. Today, however, the lingering effects of the global financial crisis, coupled with some Eurozone states’ lax budgetary discipline, have cast a shadow on the future of the Eurozone. A  Member State’s withdrawal from the EMU–long considered a taboo-no longer appears to be completely unrealistic. But do the treaties allow withdrawal? To answer […]


A REAL EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP: A NEW JURISDICTION TEST: A NOVEL CHAPTER IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNION IN EUROPE

18 Colum. J. Eur. L. 55 (2011) Dimitry Kochenov, LL.M. (CEU Budapest), LL.D. (Groningen), Professor of EU Constitutional Law and Fellow of the Graduate School of Law, University of Groningen, Oude Kijk in ‘t Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK, Groningen, The Netherlands. The reach of the law of the European Union is strictly limited It only applies to those situations that fall within its scope. Until very recently, in the case of European Union citizens, in order to fall within this scope, a so-called “cross-border situation” was required-a demonstration that the parties’ situations had a Union dimension and was not confined to one of the Member States. In the wake of a […]


THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, AND THE RIGHT TO ABORTION: ROE V WADE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ATLANTIC?

18 Colum. J. Eur. L. 1 (2011) Federico Fabbrini, PhD Researcher, Law Department, European University Institute. BA summa cum laude in European and Transnational Law at the University of Trento School of Law (Italy) (2006); JD summa cum laude in Constitutional Law at the University of Bologna School of Law (Italy) (2008); LLM in European, Comparative and International Law at the Law Department, European University Institute (2009). This Article analyzes the legal regulation of abortion within the context of Europe’s multilevel system for the protection of fundamental rights. The Article examines the constitutional dynamics and challenges that emerge in the field of abortion law from the overlap between national […]