Print Articles Volume 18, Issue 1

CASE C-375/09 PREZES URZFDU OCHRONY KONKURENCJI I KONSUMENTOW V TELE2 POLSKA SP. Z O.O., NOW NETIA SA

Published

THE PRIMACY OF THE COMMISSION IN  THE EUROPEAN COMPETITION NETWORK AS A SAFEGUARD AGAINST NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICIES AND  THE REJECTION  OF THE ‘PRIMUS INTER PARES’ DOCTRINE.

Marco Amorese, Contract Professor of Competition Law 2010-2012 Universita degli Studi di Bergamo – Ph.D., Universith degli Studi di Brescia, LL.M. Harvard Law School, J.D. University of Milan, Studio legale Amorese.

You may also like

Case Law: Case C-65/93, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-643 (Extension of System of Generalized Tariff Preferences) Case C-417/93, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-1185 (Technical Assistance to the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union and to Mongolia) Case C-21/94, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-1827 (Directive 93/89/EEC on Road Charges) The Council’s Obligation to Consult the European Parliament
Published

Case Law: Case C-65/93, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-643 (Extension of System of Generalized Tariff Preferences) Case C-417/93, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-1185 (Technical Assistance to the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union and to Mongolia) Case C-21/94, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, 1995 E.C.R. 1-1827 (Directive 93/89/EEC on Road Charges) The Council’s Obligation to Consult the European Parliament

1 Colum. J. Eur. L. 504 (1995) Piet Van Nuffel. Fellow of the Belgian National Foundation for Scientific Research, Institute for European […]