CASE LAW: CASE C-555/07, SEDA KÜCÜKDEVECI V. SWEDEX GMBH & CO. KG

Published April 19, 2016

16 Colum. J. Eur. L. 497 (2010)

Timothy Roes. Ph.D. Candidate and research assistant, Institute for European Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

THE RIGHT TO BE ONLINE: EUROPE’S RECOGNITION OF DUE PROCESS AND PROPORTIONALITY REQUIREMENTS IN CASES OF INDIVIDUAL INTERNET DISCONNECTIONS

17 Colum. J. Eur. L. 557 (2010) Andrew T Hopkins, Notes and Comments Editor, Emory International Law Review; J.D. Candidate, Emory University School of Law (2011). […]

Published April 18, 2016

APPOINTING FOXES TO GUARD HENHOUSES: THE EUROPEAN POSTED WORKERS’ DIRECTIVE

15 Colum. J. Eur. L. 123 (2008 – 2009) Aravind R. Ganesh. LL.B (Hons), King’s College, London, 2008; J.D., Columbia Law School, […]

Published March 1, 2005

EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW, JOINT DOMINANCE, AND THE WIRELESS OLIGOPOLY PROBLEM

11 Colum. J. Eur. L. 355 (2005) Patrick S. Ryan. Attorney, PSR Law Firm, LLC, Denver, Colorado. INTRODUCTION Governments in both the […]

Published June 1, 2002

Case Law: Besix

8 Colum. J. Eur. L. 493 (2002) Johan Verlinden. Case C-256/00. S.A. Besix N. V. v. Wasserreinigungsbau Alfred Kretzschmar GMBH & Co. […]

This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors' experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Columbia University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.